The Popeye Village Gunpowder Party


Groggy as I am on a Sunday morning (having lost one hour to the time switch), reading the news becomes a difficult task. When I find an article in the Times about five tanks of explosive material found floating off Popeye Village my sleepy mind conjures up a mixture of images involving Spinach, Guy Fawkes and the Boston Tea Party – not necessarily in that order.

Ever since the unfortunate Naxxar incident, possession and illegal storage of firework material has become the hottest potato on the island. Some people would rather be caught with a couple of kilos of Colombia’s finest than have a suffarell hiding under their pillow. Which is ironic. The law has not changed. Yet. The Report of the Fireworks Commission still sits on the Justice Minister’s desk (CMB), the Attorney General is still busy putting the final touches to the necessary amendments and parliament has not met to discuss any potential further measures that would require more than a Ministerial Nihil Obstat. So if the crime is not punishable in a harsher way than before – if you would still be liable to ridiculous fines as were the Gozitans found guilty earlier last week – why has there this been sudden change?

I think we have an interesting development here. We can compare it to another illegal issue – hunting – that might benefit from reporting. In the case of illegally stored fireworks the “X’gharukaza” Factor is multiplied by the riks posed to human life. It’s not just the life of those storing the materials but also of those around them. Hence if you had tolerated the farmer next door storing fireworks o.b.o the local festa committee and were previously scared to report for fear of the repercussions and possible ostracisation, now you will report because (a) the wool has been lifted from your eyes and you are aware of the danger (finally) and (b the social repercussion issue has swung in your favour – from gifa (Judas) of the village you become hero and saviour. This added value in Whistleblowing in Firework storage does not exist when we look at hunting – the only ones who report are those who have put their necks on the line and are prepared to face the hunters without the backing of a spineless authority.

From Gozo to Popeye Village our society moved “despite” the law and authority. The involvement of the administration was minimal – apart from taking action once the report was submitted. The government still falls short of doing what is necessary so long as regulation of legal fireworks factories and harsher punishments for illegal ones are not introduced. In the meantime we will enjoy the fantastical situation where every village will pop out its local hero who uncovers another dastardly devious bastard who has been stocking the “kaxxa tan-nar” in his living room. The hero will get his fifteen minutes of fame…. and many a minute of flame will be avoided. Not thanks to our politicians.


3 responses to “The Popeye Village Gunpowder Party

  1. Who was it that said : The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you’ve got it made 🙂

  2. Well unless you have a death wish you’d better report any illegal fireworks particularly now we know what this reckless past time can result in.

    However Naxxar could have been so easily avoided.

    In summer 5 people died dabbling in fireworks – well and good if they were willing to risk their lives. But it wasn’t just their lives. Houses in the neighbourhood were damaged – private property owned by people who had been protesting for years had to suffer. Given that Naxxar’s storage of chemicals was illegal, the thing is ten times as bad – but there is something the law can do.

    For starters the law could be modified in such a way as to forbid anyone who knows jack shit about chemicals and the storage of chemicals from handling explosive materials. Most people who dabble with fireworks are a bit like me – we wouldn’t even manage to pass our Chemistry O-Level. How can they be expected to deal with highly explosive and highly flammable chemicals in residential areas.

    I’m sure there’s no direct link, but last Friday Xarabank discussed this topic. I must admit, it’s not much as a discussion programme – but it certainly serves it’s purpose and it does raise awareness.

  3. My congratulations Jacques!

    Somebody voted for this blog 4 days after the end of the month of March. Hence the vote is valid for the blog of the month of March 2008 since 7 days did not pass. See Rule 1H of

    Since the blog competition started in April 2008, the vote for this blogpost is valid for the month Blog of the Month of April.

    This vote is also valid for the Blog of the Year.

    The feelings of the voter are as follows:

    J’Accuse can be infurating. J’Accuse can be a typical male chauvinist. J’Accuse can be a wankellectual. J’Accuse can be self centered. But J’Accuse can also bring forward hot issues which are worth reading and arguing about. J’accuse does not discriminate against anyone, and accepts comments for what they are. And most of all J’Accuse has persevered and gone where other bloggers have not gone. Long Live J’Accuse!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s